Politics | 25HourNews

CPB Shuts Down After 58 Years Why The Corporation For Public Broadcasting Is Dissolving On January 5, 2026, the Board of Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) officially voted to dissolve the organization. After nearly six decades of operation, the private, nonprofit entity created by Congress in 1967 is coming to an end. This decision marks the conclusion of a 58 year era of federal investment in non commercial, educational, and cultural media. The move was necessitated by the total rescission of federal funding, which made it impossible for the organization to fulfill its legal mandate.The Financial Blow: $1.1 Billion RescindedThe downfall of the CPB was accelerated by a series of aggressive budget cuts from the Republican controlled Congress, backed by the Trump administration. Last year, lawmakers voted to claw back approximately $1.1 billion in federal funding that had already been approved for the next two fiscal years. This left the CPB with zero operational capital. President and CEO Patricia Harrison stated that the board faced a "profound responsibility" to protect the integrity of the system by dissolving it rather than leaving it as a defunded, vulnerable target for further political attacks.Vulnerability to Political ManipulationOne of the primary reasons for choosing formal dissolution over a simple "wind-down" was the fear of political misuse. CPB leaders explained that a dormant, defunded organization could have been taken over by "bad faith actors" to spread specific agendas. By dissolving the nonprofit entirely, the board ensures that the CPB’s name and infrastructure cannot be manipulated. Harrison emphasized that this was a sacrificial act intended to protect the democratic values that public media has stood for since its inception.Impact on Local Stations and Rural AmericaWhile PBS and NPR are the most recognizable names associated with CPB funding, the real damage will be felt at the local level. Historically, about 70% of CPB’s funding went directly to nearly 1,500 local public radio and television stations. Many of these stations, particularly those in rural or underserved "news deserts," rely on federal dollars for more than 50% of their operating budgets. Experts estimate that as many as 80 NPR affiliated stations and dozens of local PBS outlets may be forced to shut down in the coming year.The Fight for Archives and LegacyAs part of the dissolution process, the CPB is taking steps to safeguard its historic legacy. Remaining funds will be distributed to the American Archive of Public Broadcas
Mamdani’s Mandate: How New York Embraced the Left as San Francisco Retreats to the Center The inauguration of Zohran Mamdani on January 1, 2026, marked a historic "political upset" in New York City. Sworn in at a disused subway station by Senator Bernie Sanders, Mamdani’s rise to Gracie Mansion signifies a bold bet by New Yorkers that aggressive, redistributive policies are the cure for an "unaffordable" city. Meanwhile, across the country, San Francisco long considered the vanguard of the American left is moving in the opposite direction. The 2024 and 2025 election cycles in the Bay Area saw voters oust progressive stalwarts in favor of moderate, results oriented leaders like Mayor Daniel Lurie.The Rise of Mamdani and "Municipal Socialism"Zohran Mamdani’s victory was fueled by a platform that would have seemed unthinkable a decade ago. His "economic rights" agenda includes a total rent freeze for over one million apartments, universal free childcare, and the elimination of bus fares. By framing housing and transit as public utilities rather than commodities, Mamdani successfully tapped into the deep frustrations of the working class who felt abandoned by the "market centric" consensus of previous administrations.The Mamdani administration has moved with "audacious" speed. In his first 48 hours, he revoked dozens of executive orders from his predecessor, Eric Adams, and vowed to triple the production of union built affordable housing. This "relentless improvement" model aims to turn New York into a laboratory for democratic socialism, funded by significant tax hikes on the city's top 1% of earners and large corporations.San Francisco’s "Vibe Shift" to the MiddleWhile New York leans into radicalism, San Francisco is undergoing what local analysts call a "vibe shift." The election of Daniel Lurie, a philanthropic outsider and heir to the Levi Strauss fortune, signaled a rejection of the ideological conflicts that defined the city’s previous decade. Lurie campaigned on accountability and "getting rid of the nonsense," focusing on street conditions, the fentanyl crisis, and fiscal reform.This shift isn't limited to the mayor’s office. For the first time in years, centrist members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors outnumber the progressive wing. High profile losses for incumbents like Dean Preston, a prominent democratic socialist, suggest that voters in the Bay Area are prioritizing "common sense" solutions over ideological purity. The city’s support for Proposition 36 a state measure to crack down on retail theft and drug cri
Beyond Venezuela: How the Seizure of Caracas Reignited the Battle for Greenland Sovereignty The geopolitical landscape of 2026 has been fundamentally altered by the recent events in South America. On January 3, 2026, the world watched as United States forces conducted an audacious raid in Caracas, taking the Venezuelan leadership into custody. While the international community was still processing the implications of Washington’s new interventionist stance, President Trump pivoted the conversation back to the North. In a telephone interview with The Atlantic and subsequent comments aboard Air Force One, the President stressed that the United States absolutely needs Greenland for defense.This is not the first time the idea of purchasing or acquiring Greenland has been floated by the current administration, but the context has changed. With the seizure of Venezuela serving as a fresh precedent for unilateral action, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has moved the country into a heightened state of diplomatic readiness. The rhetoric coming out of Copenhagen is sharp and uncompromising. Frederiksen recently stated that it makes absolutely no sense to talk about the U.S. needing to take over Greenland and reminded the world that the United States has no right to annex any part of the Danish Realm.The Social Media SparkWhile the President’s words carried significant weight, a single social media post from Katie Miller, wife of the influential Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, acted as the catalyst for the current "crisis mode." The post featured an image of Greenland draped in the stars and stripes with a one word caption: SOON. This viral moment triggered immediate outrage in both Nuuk and Copenhagen.Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen called the post disrespectful and unacceptable. For a people who have already declared their territory is not for sale, the insinuation that an annexation is imminent felt like a breach of the trust that has defined the NATO alliance for decades. Nielsen emphasized that Greenland is a democratic society with its own institutions and that its future will not be decided by social media posts or the fantasies of foreign leaders.Strategic Necessity vs. National SovereigntyFrom the American perspective, the drive for Greenland is rooted in two main factors: national security and natural resources. As the Arctic ice melts, new shipping lanes and vast deposits of critical minerals are becoming accessible. The Trump administration has frequently cited the presence of Russian and Chinese vessels in th
Israel Recognizes Somaliland Independence But Trump Says No to Following Suit The diplomatic landscape of the Horn of Africa underwent a seismic shift this week as Israel officially became the first United Nations member state to recognize the Republic of Somaliland as an independent and sovereign nation. However, the historic breakthrough was immediately met with a characteristic dismissal from U.S. President Donald Trump. In a candid interview with the New York Post published on Friday, December 26, 2025, Trump signaled that the United States has no immediate plans to follow its closest ally in acknowledging the breakaway region’s statehood.When asked directly if the U.S. would join Israel in recognizing Somaliland, Trump’s response was blunt. Initially starting with a hesitant "No, not at this," he quickly pivoted to a more definitive stance. "Just say, 'No,'" the President told reporters, before adding a rhetorical jab that has since gone viral: "Does anyone know what Somaliland is, really?"A Diplomatic Departure From NetanyahuThe announcement from Jerusalem came earlier that day, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu framing the move as being "in the spirit of the Abraham Accords." Netanyahu, along with Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, signed a joint declaration of mutual recognition with Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi via a televised video call. Netanyahu praised Abdullahi’s leadership and invited him to an official state visit, citing potential cooperation in agriculture, technology, and regional security.For Somaliland, a territory that has functioned as a de facto independent state since 1991 but lacked formal international recognition, the Israeli move was seen as a crowning achievement. In the capital city of Hargeisa, thousands of citizens took to the streets to celebrate, waving both the Somaliland and Israeli flags. President Abdullahi declared it a "historic moment" that would pave the way for a strategic partnership in the Red Sea corridor.However, Trump’s skepticism highlights a significant rift between the two leaders on African foreign policy. While Netanyahu views Somaliland as a strategic asset for monitoring Houthi rebels in Yemen and countering Iranian influence in the Red Sea, Trump appears more concerned with the complexities of Horn of Africa stability and his administration's existing military cooperation with the federal government of Somalia.The "Study" Approach and Project 2025Despite his dismissive remarks, Trump did not entirely slam the door on the issue for the futu
Evaluating the public response and bipartisan tributes following the terminal diagnosis of Ben Sasse Former Nebraska Senator and University of Florida President Ben Sasse announced on Tuesday that he has been diagnosed with metastasized stage four pancreatic cancer. In a candid social media post shared just before the Christmas holiday, the 53 year old described the diagnosis as a death sentence but expressed a determination to live fully in his remaining time. Sasse revealed that he received the news last week and felt it was necessary to share the update as friends and colleagues began to suspect his health was declining. The former lawmaker emphasized that while the news is devastating for his family, his Christian faith provides him with a sense of peace and hope during the advent season.The impact of this diagnosis is particularly poignant given Sasse's recent decision to withdraw from public life to care for his family. In July 2024, he resigned as the president of the University of Florida after only seventeen months in the role, citing his wife Melissa’s struggle with epilepsy and memory issues. Sasse noted in his announcement that while the past year was meant for building new family rhythms and supporting his wife, the reality of his own mortality has now taken center stage. Pancreatic cancer at this advanced stage has a remarkably low survival rate, and the former senator acknowledged that he likely has significantly less time left than he would prefer.Reactions to the news have poured in from across the political spectrum, reflecting Sasse's unique position as a traditional conservative who often broke with his party. Vice President JD Vance and Governor Gavin Newsom were among the many leaders who offered their prayers and condolences to the Sasse family. Former colleagues in the Senate, including Deb Fischer and Pete Ricketts, described the news as heartbreaking and praised Sasse’s intellectual contributions to the country. Even political rivals noted his courage in facing the diagnosis with transparency and humor, with many sharing his post as a reminder of the fragility of life and the importance of family.The strategy for Sasse in the coming months will focus on undergoing available treatments, including immunotherapy, while prioritizing time with his three children. He stated in his message that he is not going down without a fight and intends to embrace the process of dying as something that must still be lived. Sasse has long been known for his philosophical approach to leadership and the future of work, and he appears to be applyi
Examining the Public Reversal of Nicki Minaj Concerning Previous Criticisms of Federal Immigration and Border Policies The global music icon Nicki Minaj stunned both the entertainment and political worlds on Sunday December 21 2025 by making a surprise appearance at Turning Point USA’s AmericaFest convention in Phoenix Arizona. Joining Erika Kirk on stage the Grammy nominated rapper utilized the platform to express her explicit support for the current administration and its leadership. Minaj’s appearance at the event which served as a memorial for the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk marked a significant departure from her previous public stances. During her interview she praised President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance as role models for young men while emphasizing that her shift in political perspective was a result of her refusal to be pushed around by industry expectations.The impact of this appearance was felt immediately across social media as the rapper shared her admiration for the heart and soul she perceives within the federal government. Minaj specifically highlighted the relatability of both the President and Vice President noting their ability to connect with everyday Americans despite their high offices. However the event included a moment of high tension when Minaj attempting to praise the political acumen of JD Vance referred to him as an assassin. This choice of words led to a visible pause from Erika Kirk whose husband was assassinated in September. Despite the awkwardness Erika Kirk defended the rapper stating that Minaj’s courage in speaking her mind outweighed any specific verbal missteps.Reactions from the conservative community have been largely celebratory as they welcome one of the most influential figures in hip hop into the Make America Great Again movement. Turning Point USA leaders described the moment as a turning point for youth engagement suggesting that Minaj’s endorsement could bridge the gap between pop culture and conservative values. Conversely critics in the music industry have pointed to Minaj’s 2018 comments where she identified as an immigrant and condemned previous border policies. In response to these comparisons Minaj told the Arizona crowd that it is okay to change your mind and that she no longer cares about the backlash from those she described as no longer using their own minds.Strategically the rapper has recently focused her advocacy on international issues including the persecution of Christians in Nigeria. Last month she worked alongside U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz to draw attention to violence i
Comparing the treatment of Joe Biden with that of Republican predecessors on the Presidential Walk of Fame President Donald Trump recently expanded his Presidential Walk of Fame along the White House Colonnade by adding new plaques featuring detailed and pointed descriptions of former leaders. On Wednesday, visitors and members of the press observed the new installations, which provide highly partisan summaries of past administrations. The display, which connects the West Wing to the main residence, has become a focal point of the president's effort to physically and historically reshape the executive mansion. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the texts are eloquently written descriptions and noted that many were penned directly by the president himself to reflect his perspective on American history.The impact of the new plaques is most visible in the scathing descriptions reserved for recent Democratic predecessors. Most notably, the space dedicated to Joe Biden does not feature a traditional portrait but instead displays an image of an autopen, which the plaque claims was used to sign documents in his place. The accompanying text labels him as the worst president in American history and repeats claims regarding the integrity of the 2020 election. Similarly, the plaque for Barack Obama includes his middle name and describes him as one of the most divisive political figures in history while criticizing the Affordable Care Act as highly ineffective.Reactions to the installation have been predictably polarized across the political landscape. Supporters of the president view the Walk of Fame as a refreshingly honest take on history that breaks away from traditional diplomatic norms. They argue that the plaques reflect the sentiments of the millions of voters who returned the president to office earlier this year. However, critics and some historians have expressed concern over the use of the White House for what they describe as personal political grievances. Senator Lisa Murkowski recently called the move inappropriate, stating that the contributions of past presidents should not be redefined by a current sitting leader in such a partisan manner.The strategy behind the timing of these additions appears to be part of a broader year end push to solidify the president's legacy and influence over the national narrative. By placing these descriptions in a highly visible area where foreign dignitaries and officials frequently walk, the administration is ensuring that its viewpoint is the first one encountered by visitors. The plaques also serve t
Assessing the Organizational Impact of the Dan Bongino Resignation on FBI Daily Operations and Field Office Morale The Federal Bureau of Investigation is facing a significant transition at its highest levels following the official confirmation that Deputy Director Dan Bongino will resign from his post in January 2026. President Donald Trump addressed the news during a brief press encounter at Joint Base Andrews on Wednesday, December 17, stating that he believed the former Secret Service agent and conservative commentator simply wanted to go back to his show. Bongino, who was appointed as the number two official at the bureau in February 2025, confirmed the move in a social media post, expressing his gratitude to the President and FBI Director Kash Patel for the opportunity to serve. His exit marks the end of a brief and frequently debated tenure that sought to overhaul the internal culture of the nation's premier law enforcement agency.The impact of this departure is magnified by the broader upheaval currently taking place within the Department of Justice and the FBI. Bongino’s tenure was marked by several high profile clashes with other administration officials, most notably Attorney General Pamela Bondi, over the public release of sensitive investigative files. Despite these internal tensions, Bongino played a prominent role in several recent investigative successes, including the arrest of a suspect in the long standing January 6 pipe bomb case. However, his transition from a vocal critic of the federal government to a top administrator proved difficult, with Bongino often speaking candidly about the heavy personal toll the position took on his family life and his struggle to adjust to the constraints of the bureaucracy.Reactions to the resignation have been diverse, reflecting the polarized nature of Bongino’s appointment. Director Kash Patel praised his outgoing deputy as a dedicated partner who helped restore the mission of the bureau, while Attorney General Bondi issued a professional statement thanking him for his service to the country. Conversely, critics within the FBI Agents Association and career law enforcement circles expressed hope that his successor would be a career professional with extensive operational experience. To manage the workload during the transition, the administration had already taken the unusual step of appointing Andrew Bailey as a co deputy director, ensuring that the agency remains functional as it prepares for a permanent replacement.Strategically, the administration appears to be pivoting toward a phase of consolidation after