Politics | 25HourNews

The Controversy Surrounding the Continued and Expanded Deployment of the National Guard in Washington D.C. President Donald Trump swiftly condemned the targeted shooting of two National Guard soldiers in Washington D.C., using the attack to announce a dramatic escalation of his administration’s immigration crackdown policies. The incident, which took place near the White House on Wednesday afternoon, left both National Guard members in critical condition. In a video address, the President labeled the "ambush styled attack" an "act of terror" and claimed that the suspect in custody was an Afghan national who entered the United States in 2021. Trump immediately seized on the suspect's background, using the shooting to justify a major, impending review of all immigrants admitted from Afghanistan and a renewed push for mass deportations.The attack unfolded at the corner of 17th and I Streets NW, just blocks from the White House, when a lone gunman reportedly ambushed the two uniformed West Virginia National Guardsmen who were on a high visibility patrol as part of the ongoing deployment to the city. The shooter, identified by law enforcement sources as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29 year old Afghan national, was subdued and arrested at the scene after an exchange of fire, and was also taken to the hospital with multiple gunshot wounds. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, acting at the President's request, immediately ordered the deployment of an additional 500 National Guard troops to the nation's capital, reinforcing the nearly 2,200 troops already present. This decision came despite a recent federal court ruling challenging the legality of the existing deployment.In his address, President Trump directly blamed the immigration policies of the previous administration, alleging that the suspect was "flown in by the Biden administration" in 2021 under the Operation Allies Welcome program, which facilitated the resettlement of Afghans following the U.S. withdrawal. The President stated with "righteous anger and ferocious resolve" that the attack "underscores the single greatest national security threat facing our nation." He declared that the administration would now "re-examine every single alien who has entered our country from Afghanistan under Biden" and take all necessary measures to ensure the "removal of any alien from any country who does not belong here, or add benefit to our country."The shooting and the President's subsequent vow have immediately inflamed the national debate surrounding immigration, national security, and the controversial deployment of military
Analyzing the Historical Precedent: The Significance of the First Conviction of a Serving Spanish Attorney General Spain's Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, has been found guilty by the Supreme Court of disclosing confidential information, marking the first time in the country's modern history that a serving top prosecutor has faced a criminal conviction and been disqualified from office. The ruling, delivered in a split vote, carries significant political weight and deals a major blow to the Socialist government of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who had publicly defended García Ortiz throughout the controversial legal proceedings. The verdict comes amid intense scrutiny of the judiciary and a charged political environment in Spain, where the case is seen as a central battleground between the national left wing government and the conservative regional government of Madrid.The Supreme Court sentenced García Ortiz to a two year disqualification from public office, effectively removing him from his post. He was also ordered to pay a fine of €7,200 and compensate the complainant with €10,000 for moral damages. The conviction stems from an accusation that García Ortiz was responsible for leaking an email exchange to journalists concerning the tax fraud investigation of Alberto González Amador, a businessman and the partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the powerful and outspoken conservative regional president of Madrid. The leaked email reportedly contained an offer from González Amador’s lawyer to reach a plea deal, which included admitting to alleged tax offenses to avoid jail time.García Ortiz, who was appointed Attorney General in 2022, had vehemently denied the charges, stating that he had neither leaked the information nor ordered the leak. His defense argued there was "absolutely no evidence" linking him directly to the disclosure. The Attorney General’s office had issued a press release at the time of the leak to correct what it called a "false version" of the negotiations being circulated by Ayuso's political circle. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him, leading to his conviction for the crime of revealing confidential data under the Penal Code. The ruling was passed with a majority of five of the seven judges on the panel, with the remaining two judges dissenting and planning to issue a separate opinion.The verdict immediately sparked strong political reactions. Prime Minister Sánchez’s government issued a statement expressing its respect for the court’s decision but adding that it did not agree with the ruling, and announced that the p
Beyond Loyalty: Analyzing Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Strategy in Supporting the Release of the Epstein Files The alliance between Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and President Donald Trump, once considered one of the most formidable in the “America First” movement, has fractured dramatically over the issue of releasing the full Jeffrey Epstein files. Despite President Trump publicly withdrawing his endorsement and labeling the congresswoman a "traitor" and a "disgrace," Greene has staunchly defended her push for full transparency, calling the President's opposition a "huge miscalculation" and insisting she stands with the victims of the disgraced financier. This public feud has escalated tensions within the Republican Party just as the House is scheduled for a pivotal vote on a measure that would force the Justice Department to release the remaining Epstein related documents.The core of the dispute centers on a bipartisan effort to compel the release of all federal files and records related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Greene was one of only four Republicans who signed a discharge petition, joining all Democrats to force a House vote on the matter. Following this action and a subsequent television interview where Greene criticized the White House’s stance, President Trump took to social media to announce he was withdrawing his support for the Georgia lawmaker, calling her a "ranting lunatic." Greene immediately responded by sharing text messages she allegedly sent to the administration urging the release of the files and stated that her pressure on this issue was what sent the President "over the edge," making her an example to other Republicans.The fallout carries significant implications, not only for the internal dynamics of the Republican Party but also for the broader political landscape. Greene’s high profile break with the President, coupled with her support for transparency on a highly sensitive public interest matter, has attracted both praise and criticism. Her willingness to defy a leader who demands unwavering loyalty suggests a new political calculation on her part, perhaps aiming to appeal to a wider base of voters concerned with government secrecy and accountability. Furthermore, the public dispute exposes potential rifts within the MAGA movement, raising questions about its cohesion ahead of next year's midterm elections.The emotional intensity of the feud was underscored by Greene’s comments following the President’s attacks. She publicly stated she had been contacted by private security firms warning her of a “h
Examining the Far Reaching Impact of Zohran Mamdani's Historic Win on the National Progressive Movement Democrat Zohran Mamdani has been elected the new mayor of New York City, completing a remarkable ascent for the progressive candidate. The 34 year old state lawmaker defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an Independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in Tuesday's general election. His victory is seen as a significant win for the progressive wing of the Democratic party and a mandate for change focused on addressing the city's affordability crisis. The election saw one of the largest turnouts for a mayoral race in New York in over fifty years.Mamdani's win makes history on several fronts. He is set to become New York City's first Muslim mayor, the first of South Asian heritage, and the first mayor born in Africa. He will also be one of the city's youngest mayors in more than a century when he takes office on January 1, 2026. His campaign was built on a bold, affordability focused platform, which included promises to freeze rents for rent stabilized units, implement universal child care, and make bus services free and more efficient. He plans to fund these ambitious programs by raising taxes on wealthy New Yorkers and corporations.The democratic socialist energized a diverse coalition of voters, particularly young and first time participants, by focusing on the high cost of living in the city. His charismatic, social media friendly campaign and populist economic message resonated with residents who feel increasingly squeezed by rising rents and expenses. Mamdani's ability to first upset the establishment favorite Cuomo in the Democratic primary, and then secure the general election, underscores a growing appetite for left wing political leadership in the city. His campaign drew national attention and endorsements from prominent progressive figures, including Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.Despite facing heavy criticism regarding his thin resume and being the target of President Donald Trump's threats to cut federal funding to the city, Mamdani remained defiant in his victory speech, vowing to make New York a city where everyone can thrive. His incoming administration will now face the complex task of navigating the city’s vast bureaucracy and working with the state legislature, particularly Governor Kathy Hochul, to implement his ambitious agenda aimed at making the nation's largest city more equitable and affordable for its residents. The election results reflect a clear call from New Yorkers for radical soluti
How the Supreme Court's Decision on Tariffs Will Reshape US Foreign Policy and International Trade Negotiations The global trade community is keenly watching the US Supreme Court, which is scheduled to hear oral arguments in a pivotal case that will challenge the legality of President Donald Trump's sweeping use of tariffs. The consolidated cases, notably Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, will decide if the president overstepped his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose duties on goods from numerous countries.The controversy centers on the president's use of the IEEPA, a 1977 statute that allows the executive to regulate economic transactions after declaring a national emergency. Businesses and twelve US states are challenging this application, arguing that the IEEPA was never intended to grant the president the power to levy tariffs, a power the US Constitution explicitly vests in Congress. They point out that no president in the Act's nearly fifty year history has used it for this purpose before the Trump administration.This judicial showdown comes after two lower courts the US Court of International Trade and the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit already ruled against the administration, finding that the broad "reciprocal" tariffs and the separate "fentanyl" related duties exceeded the president's authority under the IEEPA. The appeals court ruling, decided 7 to 4, affirmed that tariffs are a core Congressional power. The Supreme Court's ruling will test the limits of executive power over trade and national security, which the administration has invoked to justify the tariffs.The ruling will have immense ramifications not only for American businesses, which have absorbed billions in new customs duties and face unprecedented levels of import taxes, but also for international trade relations. A decision upholding the lower courts could strike down many of the global tariffs currently in place, leading to billions of dollars in potential refunds and reshaping the US negotiating leverage. Conversely, a ruling in the president’s favor would solidify his ability to impose tariffs swiftly and broadly under an emergency declaration, potentially opening the door to even more levies and uncertainty for the world economy.Regardless of the outcome, the case is poised to fundamentally redefine the separation of powers between the President and Congress in trade policy. Experts note that even if the court curtails the president’s use of the IEEPA, other existing trade statutes could be
A Pendulum Shift in European Politics: How the Dutch Election Result Impacts the Centrist Battle Against the Far Right The centrist D66 party, led by Rob Jetten, has claimed victory in the Dutch general election held on Wednesday, emerging as the largest party after a nail biting race with the far right Freedom Party (PVV) of Geert Wilders. The results, compiled by the national news agency ANP and citing projections from almost all counted votes, put D66 in a position to lead the formation of the next government. Jetten, 38, is now on course to become the Netherlands' youngest prime minister, a historic win that saw his party make sweeping gains.The final count revealed a razor thin margin between D66 and the PVV, with both parties projected to win 26 seats in the 150 member lower house of parliament. However, D66 held a slight lead in the popular vote, estimated at just over 15,000 votes, which secures its position as the largest party and grants it the first opportunity to initiate coalition talks. The outcome marks a significant turnaround, as the PVV had been projected to win the election earlier in the campaign. The election itself was triggered after Wilders withdrew his party from the previous right wing coalition, leading to the government's collapse over a dispute on immigration policy.Rob Jetten's victory is seen by many as a rebuke to the far right, whose support significantly dropped from its record showing in the 2023 election. Jetten, a pro European and openly gay political leader, ran a campaign on a positive, hopeful message focusing on issues like affordable housing, climate policy, and competent leadership. Addressing jubilant supporters, Jetten declared that they had "shown not only to the Netherlands, but also to the world that it is possible to beat populist and extreme right movements." He pledged to get to work for all Dutch people, highlighting the need for cooperation among mainstream parties to tackle pressing national issues.Despite D66's win, forming a stable government is expected to be a complex and lengthy process due to the highly fragmented nature of the Dutch political landscape. By parliamentary convention, the leader of the winning party takes the lead in forming a coalition, which requires a majority of at least 76 seats. Potential coalition scenarios point to a broad alliance involving D66, the centre right Christian Democratic Appeal, the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), and the centre left GreenLeft Labour bloc. However, one key complication is the VVD's stated reluctance to govern with the centre left, despite
Examining the Alleged Network of Illegal Business Activities and Financial Deception Linked to Georgia's Ex Prime Minister The political landscape in Georgia has been shaken by the dramatic downfall of a former prime minister, Irakli Garibashvili, who now faces serious money laundering charges. The spectacular collapse of a figure who was once a staunch loyalist of the country’s de facto ruler marks a significant and unprecedented moment in Georgia's recent history, sparking widespread commentary on corruption and the rule of law.The key news emerged with the announcement from the Prosecutor’s Office of Georgia that the former two time Prime Minister, Irakli Garibashvili, had been charged with large scale money laundering. This prosecution follows an investigation by the Anti Corruption Department and a search of his flat on October 17, 2025, during which a substantial amount of cash, reportedly $6.5 million in US currency, was discovered and seized. Garibashvili, who served in the country's top political office from 2013 to 2015 and again from 2021 until his resignation in 2024, has reportedly pleaded guilty to the charges brought against him.The former Prime Minister is accused of engaging in covert business activities while holding public office, which is prohibited, and consequently receiving illicit income on an exceptionally large scale. To conceal the proceeds of his illegal activities, prosecutors allege he provided false information in his asset declarations, claiming to have received large annual sums as gifts from a family member. These funds were then allegedly used to acquire assets and were largely converted into foreign currency, ultimately leading to the discovery of the cash haul in his residence.The reaction to the charging of such a high profile member of the ruling elite has been one of shock and political upheaval. Garibashvili was a long time loyalist and protégé of Bidzina Ivanishvili, the influential billionaire and founder of the ruling Georgian Dream party, who is widely considered to be the country's ultimate decision maker. This prosecution is the first instance where a core member of the ruling inner circle has been targeted in a wider crackdown that has more frequently focused on opposition figures and former associates who have fallen out of favor. The authorities have requested a one million lari bail and other obligations, including the surrender of his passport, as a preventive measure.This dramatic event occurs amid a tense political environment in Georgia, where the government has faced months of significant street protests by pro West
President Trump Issues Full Pardon to Cryptocurrency Titan Changpeng Zhao in Landmark Clemency Decision President Donald Trump on Thursday issued a full and unconditional pardon to Changpeng Zhao the founder and former CEO of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Binance. The move dramatically overturns one of the most significant criminal prosecutions in the history of the digital asset industry. Zhao, widely known by his initials "CZ," had previously pleaded guilty to a felony charge of failing to maintain an effective anti-money-laundering (AML) program at the exchange and had served a four-month prison sentence, which he completed earlier in the year. This unexpected exercise of constitutional authority by the President not only erases Zhao’s conviction but also ignites a powerful political and financial debate over the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States.Zhao’s legal troubles stemmed from a lengthy investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other federal agencies. In November 2023, he pleaded guilty in a Seattle federal court, agreeing to step down as CEO as part of a massive settlement that saw Binance pay a staggering $4.3 billion fine. The charges detailed that under Zhao’s leadership, Binance had knowingly operated without the required AML and Know Your Customer (KYC) controls, allowing illicit funds to flow through the platform for activities like drug trafficking, terrorism financing, and transactions involving sanctioned entities. Federal prosecutors had initially sought a three-year prison term for Zhao, arguing that the unprecedented scale of the non-compliance warranted a severe sentence, though the presiding judge ultimately handed down a four-month term.In announcing the pardon, the White House Press Secretary characterized the previous administration’s actions against Zhao as a politically motivated “war on cryptocurrency.” The statement further argued that the prosecution of Zhao, who faced no allegations of outright fraud or identifiable victims of theft, was an egregious overreach that damaged the reputation of the United States as a global leader in technological innovation. This narrative aligns with President Trump’s broader strategy of embracing the crypto industry, a sector that has grown into a major political and financial force and one that has provided considerable support to the President’s own financial ventures. Zhao himself took to social media to express his deep gratitude to President Trump "for upholding America's commitment to fairness, innovation, and justice," pro