Politics | 25HourNews

Itamar Ben-Gvir Gun Permit Policy in Jerusalem, Controversy, International Reaction Israeli far right Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir has ignited strong international criticism after announcing a major expansion of civilian gun permits in Jerusalem a decision that many fear could increase tensions in an already sensitive region. The policy allows a large number of additional Jewish residents across numerous neighbourhoods to apply for personal firearm licences based on their place of residence. Human rights organisations, Palestinian authorities, and several foreign governments have expressed serious concern over the move. Israel continues to face ongoing conflict and security challenges, especially during sensitive religious periods such as Ramadan. Ben-Gvir has defended the policy by stating that it is designed to protect civilians from terrorism and violent crime. However, critics argue that increasing the number of armed civilians could militarise parts of Jerusalem and worsen communal tensions. Who Is Itamar Ben-Gvir? Itamar Ben-Gvir, born on May 6, 1976, is considered one of the most controversial political figures in Israel. He leads the far right political party Otzma Yehudit, also known as Jewish Power, and serves as Minister of National Security in the government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Ben-Gvir’s political beliefs are influenced by Kahanism, an extremist ideology inspired by Rabbi Meir Kahane. Kahane’s original political movement was banned in Israel due to its racist positions and calls for the forced removal of Palestinians. These ideological links have made Ben-Gvir a divisive figure both within Israel and internationally. Before entering politics, Ben-Gvir worked as a lawyer and became known for defending Jewish nationalist activists in court. Over time, he gained media attention for provocative political activism, particularly in disputed areas of Jerusalem. His strong nationalist views and hard line security stance have drawn both support and criticism. Since taking office, Ben-Gvir has advocated for easing firearm regulations for civilians and encouraging greater involvement of armed citizens in public security. Supporters argue that such measures strengthen community safety, while critics warn they may increase instability. What Is the Expanded Gun Permit Policy? Under the expanded firearm licensing policy, more Jewish neighbourhoods in Jerusalem now qualify as eligible residential zones for gun permits. Residents can apply for personal firearms even if they do not have milita
Why Did Trump Fire Kristi Noem as DHS Secretary? Who Is Markwayne Mullin? In a move that has stirred significant political debate in Washington, U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly dismissed Kristi Noem from her role as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security. The sudden decision has prompted questions about the reasons behind the firing and speculation about who may take her place.Among the names being discussed as a potential replacement is Markwayne Mullin, a Republican senator whose growing influence within the party has attracted attention in recent years.Sudden Leadership ShakeUpThe decision to remove Kristi Noem from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) came as a surprise to many political observers. Noem, who previously served as the governor of South Dakota, had been appointed to the role with strong backing from Trump and conservative allies.However, sources close to the administration suggest that tensions had been building behind the scenes over policy priorities, management of border security operations, and internal disagreements within the department.DHS plays a critical role in national security, overseeing immigration enforcement, border protection, cybersecurity, disaster response, and counterterrorism efforts. Leadership disputes within such a key agency often attract intense political scrutiny.Possible Reasons Behind the DismissalWhile the White House has not publicly released a full explanation for the dismissal, analysts point to several potential factors that may have contributed to the decision.One issue reportedly involved disagreements over border policy and enforcement strategies. Immigration remains one of the most politically sensitive topics in American politics, and the administration has faced ongoing pressure from lawmakers and voters demanding stricter measures.Another possible factor was internal criticism about coordination between DHS and other federal agencies responsible for security and intelligence. Some officials believed the department needed stronger leadership to manage complex national security challenges.Political strategy may also have played a role. Presidents sometimes replace cabinet officials to signal policy shifts, strengthen alliances within their party, or prepare for upcoming legislative battles.Who Is Kristi Noem?Kristi Noem is a prominent Republican figure who gained national attention during her time as governor of South Dakota. Known for her conservative political stance, she built a reputation as a strong supporter of Trump’s policies.
Sir John Curtice: GreensWin Signals New Era of Uncertainty in British Politics The recent electoral success of the Green Party has injected fresh uncertainty into the future of British politics, according to renowned polling expert Sir John Curtice. The veteran political analyst said the Greens’ breakthrough result marks a significant shift in voter behaviour and could herald a more fragmented and unpredictable political landscape in the years ahead.Speaking in the aftermath of the vote, Sir John argued that the Green Party’s performance demonstrates that traditional two-party dominance by Conservative Party and Labour Party can no longer be taken for granted. “What we are witnessing is a clear signal that British politics is becoming more fluid,” he said. “Voters are increasingly willing to move away from the established parties.”A Breakthrough Moment for the GreensThe Green Party’s win whether in a parliamentary by-election, local council, or broader electoral contest has been described as historic. For years, the party has campaigned on environmental protection, social justice, and electoral reform, but its influence has often been limited by the UK’s first-past-the-post voting system.This time, however, the Greens managed to convert rising public concern about climate change, cost-of-living pressures, and public services into tangible electoral gains. The result underscores a growing appetite for alternative political voices, particularly among younger voters and urban constituencies.Sir John Curtice noted that while smaller parties have previously experienced surges citing examples such as the Liberal Democrats and UKIP what makes this moment different is the broader erosion of loyalty to traditional party identities.Fragmentation of the Political LandscapeAccording to Sir John, the Greens’ success is part of a wider pattern of fragmentation. In recent years, voter volatility has increased dramatically. The Brexit referendum, the COVID-19 pandemic, and economic turbulence have all contributed to reshaping political alignments.“British politics is no longer defined solely by the left-right economic divide,” Sir John observed. “Cultural issues, environmental concerns, and generational divides are playing an increasingly important role.”The rise of the Green Party complicates strategic calculations for both Labour and the Conservatives. For Labour, the Greens pose a potential challenge in progressive urban strongholds, potentially splitting the centre-left vote. For the Conservatives, the broader fragmenta
Zelenskyy Disappointed as Geneva Ukraine Talks End Without Concrete Breakthrough Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has expressed deep disappointment after the latest round of diplomatic negotiations in Geneva ended without a meaningful breakthrough. The meeting was seen as a critical opportunity to push forward the peace process and create a structured path toward ending the war. In the days before the talks, global attention intensified and expectations grew that the discussions would deliver practical outcomes. However, the results fell short of Ukraine’s hopes, highlighting the ongoing gap between diplomatic dialogue and real progress on the ground. Limited Breakthrough Despite High Expectations The Geneva meeting carried significant weight because it brought together influential international voices at a time when the conflict has entered a prolonged and complex phase. Ukraine had hoped that this platform would produce a clear framework for future negotiations and set timelines for key decisions. Instead, the talks concluded with general statements that lacked binding commitments. For Kyiv, this outcome reinforced the concern that while diplomatic engagement continues, it is moving too slowly to match the urgency of the situation. Zelenskyy’s response reflected not only frustration but also a message to global partners that symbolic progress is no longer sufficient for a country facing daily military and economic pressure. Core Issues Still Unresolved Security guarantees remain the most critical demand for Ukraine. The government in Kyiv believes that any peace arrangement without strong and enforceable protections would only create a temporary pause in the conflict rather than a lasting solution. Ukraine is seeking assurances that would prevent future attacks and strengthen its long term defense capabilities. At the same time, the issue of territorial control continues to block progress. For Ukraine, territorial integrity is non negotiable, and any proposal that does not recognize this position is unlikely to gain support. Humanitarian concerns were also expected to play a central role in the negotiations. Ukraine had pushed for expanded prisoner exchanges, safer evacuation routes for civilians, and increased international aid for war affected regions. While these topics were discussed, there were no major announcements that could immediately improve conditions for people living in conflict zones. This lack of tangible results is particularly disappointing for a country where millions remain displaced and critical i
Starmer Pressured by Mandelson Epstein Row as Minister Rallies Behind PM A senior Cabinet minister has come forward to defend UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer amid growing political turmoil sparked by revelations linked to Lord Peter Mandelson’s appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the United States. The minister argued that Mandelson “conned everybody” during the vetting process and insisted the Prime Minister made the right call in removing him once the truth emerged, pushing back against mounting criticism from within the Labour Party. The row erupted after documents were made public showing that Mandelson had connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, information that was not fully disclosed during his appointment. The controversy has triggered an internal Labour backlash, with some MPs openly questioning Starmer’s judgment and suggesting broader problems within the government’s appointment systems. What the Minister Said About Starmer’s Leadership Housing Secretary Steve Reed stepped into the political spotlight to defend Starmer’s leadership, saying it was not the Prime Minister who was at fault but rather the flawed information provided by Mandelson. Reed said that Lord Mandelson misled officials about the nature and extent of his relationship with Epstein and that Starmer acted decisively once the scale of the deception became clear. According to Reed, the vetting process did not uncover any red flags that contradicted Mandelson’s own statements about his past connections, and that Starmer was effectively “taken at his word.” Reed insisted that the Prime Minister’s team had followed established procedures, and that the blame should fall on Mandelson and the vetting system itself. The minister added that Starmer’s premiership remains secure despite growing anger from a faction of Labour MPs, and that the government is committed to transparency by releasing relevant documents for public scrutiny. The Mandelson Controversy and Epstein Links The political crisis stems from revelations that Lord Peter Mandelson, a veteran Labour politician who once served as a cabinet minister under previous Labour governments, maintained a continued association with Jeffrey Epstein even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Documents suggest that Mandelson shared market-sensitive information with Epstein in 2009, when he was a senior government minister. Prime Minister Starmer acknowledged in Parliament that he knew about Mandelson’s past ties with Epstein when appointing him to the ambassado
TraiTories: How the Defection of Robert Jenrick Rewrote the Political Rulebook The British political landscape has been rocked by a development so significant that it has triggered what many are calling the final collapse of the traditional right. On Thursday January 15 2026 the former shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick was unceremoniously sacked by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch following the discovery of an alleged secret plot to jump ship. Within hours the disgraced former minister was standing shoulder to shoulder with Nigel Farage at a Reform UK press conference officially announcing his defection. The event has birthed the viral moniker TraiTories as loyalists and defectors trade insults in a battle for the soul of the British electorate.The Midnight Sting and the Sacking of a RivalThe drama began in the early hours of Thursday when Kemi Badenoch announced on social media that she had received irrefutable evidence of Jenrick’s clandestine plans. According to insiders the evidence was a leaked draft of a resignation speech found by a member of Jenrick’s own inner circle. Badenoch acted with a ruthlessness that has become her trademark immediately removing the party whip and suspending Jenrick’s membership before he could deliver the news on his own terms.The move was designed to portray Jenrick not as a principled defector but as a conspirator caught in the act. In a stern video address Badenoch stated that the party deserved better than representatives who plot in the shadows to inflict maximum damage on their colleagues. By the time the sun rose over Westminster the man who was once the runner up for the Conservative leadership was a political exile.The Rise of the TraiToriesThe term TraiTories began trending almost immediately reflecting the deep sense of betrayal felt by the Conservative grassroots. For many the label captures a growing trend of high profile Conservative figures abandoning the party for the perceived common sense of Reform UK. Jenrick is the eighteenth significant figure to make the switch following in the footsteps of others like Nadhim Zahawi.During his debut press conference with Reform UK Jenrick launched a blistering attack on his former home. He described the Conservative Party as rotten and claimed it had lost the stomach for the radical change the country desperately needs. Jenrick argued that both the Tories and Labour had effectively broken Britain through years of mismanagement regarding immigration and the economy. This rhetoric has further fueled the TraiTories narrative with loy
CPB Shuts Down After 58 Years Why The Corporation For Public Broadcasting Is Dissolving On January 5, 2026, the Board of Directors of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) officially voted to dissolve the organization. After nearly six decades of operation, the private, nonprofit entity created by Congress in 1967 is coming to an end. This decision marks the conclusion of a 58 year era of federal investment in non commercial, educational, and cultural media. The move was necessitated by the total rescission of federal funding, which made it impossible for the organization to fulfill its legal mandate.The Financial Blow: $1.1 Billion RescindedThe downfall of the CPB was accelerated by a series of aggressive budget cuts from the Republican controlled Congress, backed by the Trump administration. Last year, lawmakers voted to claw back approximately $1.1 billion in federal funding that had already been approved for the next two fiscal years. This left the CPB with zero operational capital. President and CEO Patricia Harrison stated that the board faced a "profound responsibility" to protect the integrity of the system by dissolving it rather than leaving it as a defunded, vulnerable target for further political attacks.Vulnerability to Political ManipulationOne of the primary reasons for choosing formal dissolution over a simple "wind-down" was the fear of political misuse. CPB leaders explained that a dormant, defunded organization could have been taken over by "bad faith actors" to spread specific agendas. By dissolving the nonprofit entirely, the board ensures that the CPB’s name and infrastructure cannot be manipulated. Harrison emphasized that this was a sacrificial act intended to protect the democratic values that public media has stood for since its inception.Impact on Local Stations and Rural AmericaWhile PBS and NPR are the most recognizable names associated with CPB funding, the real damage will be felt at the local level. Historically, about 70% of CPB’s funding went directly to nearly 1,500 local public radio and television stations. Many of these stations, particularly those in rural or underserved "news deserts," rely on federal dollars for more than 50% of their operating budgets. Experts estimate that as many as 80 NPR affiliated stations and dozens of local PBS outlets may be forced to shut down in the coming year.The Fight for Archives and LegacyAs part of the dissolution process, the CPB is taking steps to safeguard its historic legacy. Remaining funds will be distributed to the American Archive of Public Broadcas
Mamdani’s Mandate: How New York Embraced the Left as San Francisco Retreats to the Center The inauguration of Zohran Mamdani on January 1, 2026, marked a historic "political upset" in New York City. Sworn in at a disused subway station by Senator Bernie Sanders, Mamdani’s rise to Gracie Mansion signifies a bold bet by New Yorkers that aggressive, redistributive policies are the cure for an "unaffordable" city. Meanwhile, across the country, San Francisco long considered the vanguard of the American left is moving in the opposite direction. The 2024 and 2025 election cycles in the Bay Area saw voters oust progressive stalwarts in favor of moderate, results oriented leaders like Mayor Daniel Lurie.The Rise of Mamdani and "Municipal Socialism"Zohran Mamdani’s victory was fueled by a platform that would have seemed unthinkable a decade ago. His "economic rights" agenda includes a total rent freeze for over one million apartments, universal free childcare, and the elimination of bus fares. By framing housing and transit as public utilities rather than commodities, Mamdani successfully tapped into the deep frustrations of the working class who felt abandoned by the "market centric" consensus of previous administrations.The Mamdani administration has moved with "audacious" speed. In his first 48 hours, he revoked dozens of executive orders from his predecessor, Eric Adams, and vowed to triple the production of union built affordable housing. This "relentless improvement" model aims to turn New York into a laboratory for democratic socialism, funded by significant tax hikes on the city's top 1% of earners and large corporations.San Francisco’s "Vibe Shift" to the MiddleWhile New York leans into radicalism, San Francisco is undergoing what local analysts call a "vibe shift." The election of Daniel Lurie, a philanthropic outsider and heir to the Levi Strauss fortune, signaled a rejection of the ideological conflicts that defined the city’s previous decade. Lurie campaigned on accountability and "getting rid of the nonsense," focusing on street conditions, the fentanyl crisis, and fiscal reform.This shift isn't limited to the mayor’s office. For the first time in years, centrist members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors outnumber the progressive wing. High profile losses for incumbents like Dean Preston, a prominent democratic socialist, suggest that voters in the Bay Area are prioritizing "common sense" solutions over ideological purity. The city’s support for Proposition 36 a state measure to crack down on retail theft and drug cri