The UK's long running effort to secure a 0% tariff on its steel exports to the United States has been put on hold, disappointing British industry leaders. Hopes for a breakthrough had been raised ahead of a state visit by the US President, but a deal to fully eliminate the 25% levy has been shelved. This outcome is a blow to the UK's steel sector, which had been seeking more favorable terms in a fiercely competitive global market.

The push to reduce the tariff on British steel to zero was a key component of the wider trade deal between the two nations, which was agreed to in May. While other elements of that agreement have gone forward, the steel portion proved to be a sticking point. According to reports, the deal was put on ice due to concerns from the US side that the UK could become a backdoor for cheap steel imports from other countries, particularly from nations like China where production is heavily subsidized.

For the UK steel industry, this decision is a significant setback. The 25% tariff makes British steel more expensive and less competitive in the US market, which accounts for up to 9% of the UK’s total steel exports by value. Industry leaders had hoped for a tariff free quota, which would have provided much needed relief and certainty. While the current 25% tariff is better than the 50% rate faced by other countries like those in the EU, the failure to secure the 0% rate is seen as a missed opportunity to fully capitalize on the special relationship between the two countries.

In response to the news, a spokesperson for UK Steel, the industry's trade body, expressed disappointment but also noted that the 25% rate provides some stability. The UK government, for its part, has stated that negotiations with the US are ongoing and that it remains committed to protecting skilled jobs in the steel industry. This outcome highlights the complex and often challenging nature of modern trade negotiations, where even close partners find it difficult to reconcile domestic protectionism with free trade ideals. It also underscores a broader shift in global trade dynamics, with more countries erecting barriers to protect their industries from what they see as a flood of heavily subsidized international steel.