A leading mayoral candidate is at the centre of growing controversy after it was revealed that they were mistakenly diagnosed with dementia just months before launching their campaign.

The candidate, whose name is being withheld due to medical privacy concerns, was initially diagnosed with early-onset dementia last year following routine cognitive assessments. The diagnosis prompted widespread concern about the candidate’s ability to serve in public office. However, recent medical evaluations have confirmed that the original diagnosis was incorrect, attributing the symptoms to a treatable neurological condition unrelated to dementia.

Despite the corrected diagnosis, the revelation has ignited fierce debate among voters, political analysts, and medical professionals. Critics argue that the candidate’s failure to disclose the initial diagnosis earlier undermines public trust. Supporters, on the other hand, view the misdiagnosis as a deeply personal and unfortunate medical error, emphasising the candidate’s transparency and resilience in coming forward.

In a press statement released Tuesday, the candidate said, “I was as shocked as anyone by the original diagnosis. I followed every medical recommendation, and I’m grateful that further testing revealed the truth. My focus remains on serving the people.”

Medical experts warn that misdiagnosis of dementia is not uncommon, particularly in high-stress individuals, and can stem from a range of overlapping symptoms such as memory lapses, anxiety, or sleep disorders.

As the election approaches, the incident has become a polarising issue on the campaign trail, with rival candidates calling for clearer medical disclosures and mental fitness evaluations for public figures.

The situation highlights the delicate balance between privacy, health, and public accountability—raising broader questions about how society treats both illness and leadership.